The Miller Lab

  • Home
  • Research
  • The Team
    • Lab Members
    • Lab Alumni
    • Earl K. Miller
  • Publications
    • Publications
    • Preprints
  • In the News
  • 5
    Oct 2015

    Award video: 2015 Professional Achievement Award – Earl Miller


    Miller Lab
    In The News, Miller Laboratory

    Video of Earl Miller for the 2015 Professional Achievement Award from the Kent State University Alumni Association.

    2015 Kent State Alumni Awards

  • 24
    Sep 2015

    Earl Miller wins Professional Achievement Award from Kent State University Alumni Association


    Miller Lab
    In The News, Miller Laboratory

    And makes his hometown newspaper:
    On the Move – The Cleveland Plain Dealer 9-23-15

  • 18
    Aug 2015

    New paper: Stimulus Load and Oscillatory Activity in Higher Cortex


    Miller Lab
    Miller Laboratory, Neuroscience

    Advance copy of our new paper:
    Kornblith, S. Buschman, T.J., and Miller, E.K. (2015) Stimulus Load and Oscillatory Activity in Higher Cortex.  Cerebral Cortex.  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv182  Journal link

    Abstract:
    Exploring and exploiting a rich visual environment requires perceiving, attending, and remembering multiple objects simultaneously. Recent studies have suggested that this mental “juggling” of multiple objects may depend on oscillatory neural dynamics. We recorded local field potentials from the lateral intraparietal area, frontal eye fields, and lateral prefrontal cortex while monkeys maintained variable numbers of visual stimuli in working memory. Behavior suggested independent processing of stimuli in each hemifield. During stimulus presentation, higher-frequency power (50–100 Hz) increased with the number of stimuli (load) in the contralateral hemifield, whereas lower-frequency power (8–50 Hz) decreased with the total number of stimuli in both hemifields. During the memory delay, lower-frequency power increased with contralateral load. Load effects on higher frequencies during stimulus encoding and lower frequencies during the memory delay were stronger when neural activity also signaled the location of the stimuli. Like power, higher-frequency synchrony increased with load, but beta synchrony (16–30 Hz) showed the opposite effect, increasing when power decreased (stimulus presentation) and decreasing when power increased (memory delay). Our results suggest roles for lower-frequency oscillations in top-down processing and higher-frequency oscillations in bottom-up processing.

  • 30
    Jun 2015

    Inferior-frontal cortex phase synchronizes with the temporal–parietal junction prior to successful change detection


    Miller Lab
    Miller Laboratory

    Micheli et al find that during sustained attention, successful near-threshold visual detection is predicted by increased phase synchrony between the frontal and temporal/parietal cortex.  They suggest that beta coherent states in the prefrontal cortex regulate top-down expectancy and coupling with posterior cortex facilitates the gating of that information.

    Evidence for the role of beta in top-down selection continues to mount.

    Micheli, Cristiano, et al. “Inferior-frontal cortex phase synchronizes with the temporal-parietal junction prior to successful change detection.” NeuroImage (2015).

  • 18
    Jun 2015

    New paper: Cortical information flow during flexible sensorimotor decisions


    Miller Lab
    In The News, Miller Laboratory, Neuroscience

    Siegel, M., Buschman, T.J., and Miller, E.K. (2015) Cortical information flow during flexible sensorimotor decisions.  Science. 19 June 2015: 1352-1355.

    During flexible behavior, multiple brain regions encode sensory inputs, the current task, and choices.  It remains unclear how these signals evolve. We simultaneously recorded neuronal activity from six cortical regions (MT, V4, IT, LIP, PFC and FEF) of monkeys reporting the color or motion of stimuli. Following a transient bottom-up sweep, there was a top-down flow of sustained task information from frontoparietal to visual cortex.  Sensory information flowed from visual to parietal and prefrontal cortex. Choice signals developed simultaneously in frontoparietal regions and travelled to FEF and sensory cortex. This suggests that flexible sensorimotor choices emerge in a frontoparietal network from the integration of opposite flows of sensory and task information.

    From the MIT News Office:

    Uncovering a dynamic cortex

    Neuroscientists show that multiple cortical regions are needed to process information.

  • 18
    May 2015

    Time.com – You Asked: Are My Devices Messing With My Brain?


    Miller Lab
    In The News, Miller Laboratory, Neuroscience, Psychology

    Earl Miller is quoted in a Time article about the dangers of multitasking:

    You Asked: Are My Devices Messing With My Brain?  Time (May 13, 2015)
    http://time.com/3855911/phone-addiction-digital-distraction/

    ““Every time you switch your focus from one thing to another, there’s something called a switch-cost,” says Dr. Earl Miller, a professor of neuroscience at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Your brain stumbles a bit, and it requires time to get back to where it was before it was distracted.”  ““You’re not able to think as deeply on something when you’re being distracted every few minutes,” Miller adds. “And thinking deeply is where real insights come from.”

  • 30
    Apr 2015

    Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons


    Miller Lab
    Miller Laboratory, Neuroscience

    Miller Lab alumnus, Andreas Nieder, continues his epic investigations into the neural basis of number sense.  Here, Viswanathan and Nieder show that training to make numerosity judgments sharpens neural selectivity in frontal cortex but not in parietal cortex.  It seems that the number representations in parietal cortex are innate whereas in the frontal cortex, they are learned.

  • 23
    Mar 2015

    Choice-correlated activity fluctuations underlie learning of neuronal category representation


    Miller Lab
    Miller Laboratory, Neuroscience

    Miller Lab alumnus David Freedman and colleagues present a model that shows how categorical neural activity can develop through learning.   As a result of top-down influences from decision neurons, categorical representations develop in neurons that show choice-correlated activity fluctuations.  They test the model via recordings from parietal cortex.

    Choice-correlated activity fluctuations underlie learning of neuronal category representation
    Tatiana A. Engel, Warasinee Chaisangmongkon, David J. Freedman & Xiao-Jing Wang

  • 24
    Feb 2015

    Melissa Warden is a 2015 Sloan Research Fellow


    Miller Lab
    In The News, Miller Laboratory

    Miller Lab alumnus Melissa Warden has been awarded a Sloan Research Fellowship.
    2015 Sloan Research Fellows

    We could not be prouder of her if she were a Little Lebowski Urban Achiever.

  • 23
    Feb 2015

    New paper: Frequency-specific hippocampal-prefrontal interactions during associative learning


    Miller Lab
    In The News, Miller Laboratory, Neuroscience

    Frequency-specific hippocampal-prefrontal interactions during associative learning
    Brincat, S.L. and Miller, E.K. (2015) Nature Neuroscience, advanced online publication

    Abstract:
    Much of our knowledge of the world depends on learning associations (for example, face-name), for which the hippocampus (HPC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) are critical. HPC-PFC interactions have rarely been studied in monkeys, whose cognitive and mnemonic abilities are akin to those of humans. We found functional differences and frequency-specific interactions between HPC and PFC of monkeys learning object pair associations, an animal model of human explicit memory. PFC spiking activity reflected learning in parallel with behavioral performance, whereas HPC neurons reflected feedback about whether trial-and-error guesses were correct or incorrect. Theta-band HPC-PFC synchrony was stronger after errors, was driven primarily by PFC to HPC directional influences and decreased with learning. In contrast, alpha/beta-band synchrony was stronger after correct trials, was driven more by HPC and increased with learning. Rapid object associative learning may occur in PFC, whereas HPC may guide neocortical plasticity by signaling success or failure via oscillatory synchrony in different frequency bands.

←
1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 13
→

Accessibility

© 2025 Earl K. Miller & Miller Lab at MIT. All rights reserved. Website design by Tahiri Media.